Dick Francis: The Danger

The DangerThe Danger
Dick Francis
First published in the UK 1983, Michael Joseph Ltd
This edition Pan Books, 2007
ISBN: 9780330450423
406 pages
Source: British Red Cross, Wymondham

Kidnapping, you see, is my business.

Andrew Douglas works for Liberty Market, an agency specialising in kidnappings: advising on their prevention, negotiating ransoms, providing advice and support to the families and victims. The Danger follows him through three kidnap cases in three countries: young Italian jockey Alessia Cenci, 3-year-old English boy Dominic Nerrity, and Jockey Club official Morgan Freemantle. Douglas soon deduces that all three cases have links to the world of racing, and that a single individual – ‘HIM’ – is responsible for all of three.

Douglas’ work depends on a good relationship with local police forces. The police can be overly focused on capturing the kidnappers rather than rescuing the victim, whereas Douglas always puts the victim first. And not just their physical safety – he thinks about the emotional and financial implications too.

To save the victims’ future equilibrium had gradually become to me as important as their actual physical freedom.

Kidnappers always start with a massively unreasonable demand. They don’t expect to get it; they’re just trying to make anything less seem a relief. Pay too much too soon and the kidnappers think they have underestimated your resources and try to extort a second fee before releasing the victim. And don’t let the kidnappers ruin you financially – the released victim will feel guilty, which will generate resentment that can tear the family apart. The Danger is full of top tips like this, and seems closely based on interviews with real individuals in organisations similar to Liberty Market (‘No one who has helped me with the background of this book wants to be mentioned,’ says Francis in the Acknowledgements).

Comparing my thoughts on Francis’ Twice Shy to my notes for The Danger, I see one big difference. I didn’t find Douglas as off-puttingly arrogant and misogynistic as the heroes of Twice Shy. The odious father of Dominic Nerrity – not altogether convinced he’d trade financial ruin for his son, dismissive of his wife’s abilities and emotions, and unable to work with people who don’t agree with him – seems far more like those guys.

Douglas is an expert in keeping his feelings under control, letting logic rather than emotion drive his reactions. But he isn’t unlikeable with it. The slow uncovering of his feelings for his love-interest reads as a genuine journey from emotional prop to equal partner in a relationship.

Overall, this is a rock-solid, if unchallenging, thriller. The comparative rarity of books about kidnapping, and the fact that it is obviously closely informed by real-life cases, lend it interest. Well worth a read.

See also: The Village Smith: ‘In “The Danger”, Dick Francis delves more deeply into human nature, motives, and the quixotic personalities of people under pressure, than any other book I’ve read by him’

I am entering The Danger in the 2014 Vintage Mystery Reading Challenge (book featuring a crime other than murder).

Final destination: Greenmetropolis

Creative Commons License
Past Offences by Rich Westwood is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
This entry was posted in 2014 Vintage Mystery Reading Challenge, Classic mystery book review, Espionage, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Dick Francis: The Danger

  1. Margot Kinberg says:

    Rich – A fine review, for which thanks. I’m more familiar with some of Francis’ other work than with this one. Seems it’s time for me to try it.


  2. Pingback: Crime fiction pick of the month: February 2014 | Past Offences

  3. My mum used to love his books but I’ve only read a few – thanks Rich.


    • westwoodrich says:

      Mums (and especially Queen Mums) reading his books is probably the biggest problem with Dick Francis. I’ve only read two, and they’re both nothing like my image of Dick Francis. On the basis of those two, I think he’s good rather than great, but I’d never have picked up either of them if they weren’t on the Crime Writers’ Association top 100 list.


  4. FictionFan says:

    I agree with your ‘good rather than great’ analysis. I read about a million of these when I was young and always enjoyed them though I can’t now remember a single plot. They do get a bit samey after a while, but that’s always going to be the case with someone so prolific.


Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s