Arthur J. Rees: The Shrieking Pit

The Shrieking Pit
Arthur J. Rees
First published in the UK, 1919
This edition: Project Gutenberg

The inn, seen in the grey evening of a grey day, had a stark and sinister aspect, an atmosphere of mystery and secretiveness, an air of solitary aloofness in the dreary marshes, standing half shrouded in the night mists which were sluggishly crawling across the oozing flats from the sea. It was not a place where people could be happy—this battered abode of a past age on the edge of the North Sea, with the bitter waters of the marshes lapping its foundations, and the cold winds for ever wailing round its gaunt white walls.

I read my first Arthur J. Rees novel, The Moon Rock, last month, and found it a little underwhelming. However, in the course of finding out a bit more about the Australian-born Rees, I discovered one of his better-regarded novels was set in Norfolk (which is where I live) and decided to give it a try.

A Flegne-like landscape at Morston Salt Marshes. Picture by Colin Park, geograph.org.uk

A Flegne-like landscape at Morston Salt Marshes in Norfolk. Picture by Colin Park, geograph.org.uk

From page one, it was clear that this was a much more readable book. It opens in the breakfast room of the Grand Hotel, Durrington, in October 1916, a couple of nights after a Zeppelin attack has scared away many of the guests. Our hero Grant Colwyn is watching a young man, James Ronald, sitting alone at a nearby table, repeatedly and deliberately stabbing the tablecloth. To Colwyn the diagnosis is clear:

‘It must be shell-shock, and a very bad case – probably supposed to be cured, and sent up here to recuperate. I’ll keep an eye on him.’

Colwyn is joined at his table by Sir Henry Durwood, a renowned nerve specialist who has also been observing Ronald. Durwood and Colwyn are just in time to interrupt him as he begins what could be a violent fit, and carry him upstairs to his room to help him recover himself in peace. Sir Henry identifies epilepsy as the cause, and offers to take Ronald on as a patient.

However, next morning Ronald slips away from the Grand without settling his bill. His name soon crops up again – in connection with a robbery and murder at the remote village of Flegne. Ronald checked in to the Golden Anchor Inn, and that same night the other resident, the archeologist Roger Glenthorpe, was killed. Glenthorpe’s body was discovered by some locals at the bottom of the Shrieking Pit of the title. Ronald left the inn in a hurry in the morning, before the body was found, and has vanished.

Things seem clear enough, especially when Sir Henry weighs in with his diagnosis of epilepsy.

‘Is it consistent with petit mal, combined with furor epilepticus, for a man to commit murder, conceal the body of his victim, and remember nothing about it afterwards?’
‘Quite consistent, though the probability is, as I said before, for him to have some hazy recollection when he came to his senses, which would lead to his leaving that place as quickly as he could.’

However, Colwyn is no ordinary tourist. He is Grant Colwyn the famous detective –

‘Who has not heard of you, and your skill in the unravelling of crime? There are many people on both sides of the Atlantic who regard you as a public benefactor.’

– and he doesn’t believe Ronald is guilty. Colwyn is intuitive rather than a great thinker, and worries away at the case clue-by-clue until he sees a chink of light. His reputation means the police (or, at least, the gentlemanly top brass) are happy to include him in their investigations and conferences. However, the relationship between amateur and professional is less genial than usual. On a couple of occasions either Colwyn or his police rival Galloway ends up going off in a huff.

‘…my dear Galloway,’ said Colwyn genially. ‘Your gift of overcoming points which tell against you by ignoring them, and your careful avoidance of telltale inferences, would make you an ideal Crown Prosecutor.’
‘I don’t believe in inferences in crime,’ replied Galloway, flushing under the detective’s sarcasm. ‘I am a plain man, and I like to stick to facts.’

Despite Colwyn’s misgivings, Ronald is soon up in court for murder. But of course, Colwyn eventually spots some peculiarities which the police have overlooked.

The Shrieking Pit is a product of its time, and a lot of the book is spent unravelling clues. The Flegne inn, the Golden Anchor, is a rich seam of eccentricity. The landlord is a giant; his mother is violently insane and is kept locked in her room with her grand-daughter for company; the waiter is a lip-reading hunchback. The building itself is ripe for Golden Age detection, being built directly on to the side of a hill with a multitude of corridors running along its length, interconnecting rooms, recently installed gas lighting, and upstairs windows which can be comfortably reached from the ground.

Some good atmosphere also comes from a spooky quirk in the Inn’s wind-swept location. The Shrieking Pit is part of a prehistoric dwelling site Glenthorpe was analysing. The shrieking is supplied by its resident ghost, a White Lady who brings death to anyone who sees her. The locals are superstitious enough to stay away from the Pit during the night.

(By the way, there is a real Shrieking Pit in Norfolk, presumably Rees’ inspiration for the title, although it is nothing to do with prehistoric dwellings.)

The Norfolk setting, despite the fictionalised place names, is strong. The county’s cavalier attitude to place names is captured perfectly in Flegne, pronounced Fly by the locals. I’m not entirely sure how successful Rees’s dialect is. He does apologise in the Preface (‘I have found it impossible to transliterate the pronunciation into the ordinary English alphabet’), but he gives it a good try:

‘the chap that carried him must ‘a’ been powerful strong, because Herward told him his own arms were begunnin’ ter ache good tidily just a-howdin’ him up to the rope when they wor being a-hawled out the pit.’

There are some neatly amusing cameos:

Mr. Edgehill, the coroner, was one of those people who seized upon the war as a pretext for the exercise of their natural proclivity to interfere in other people’s affairs. He took the opportunity that every inquest gave him to lecture the British public on their duties and responsibilities in war-time. The body on which he was sitting formed his text, the jury was his congregation, and the newspaper reporters the vehicles by which his admonitions were conveyed to the nation. Mr. Edgehill saw a shirker in every suicide, national improvidence in a corpse with empty pockets, and had even been able to discover a declining war morale in death by misadventure. He thanked God for air raids and food queues because they brought the war home to civilians, and he was never tired of asserting that he lived on half the voluntary rations scale, did harder work, felt ten years younger, and a hundred times more virtuous, in consequence.

Unlike The Moon Rock, The Shrieking Pit is a pacy read, atmospheric without being heavy-handed, and has a satisfactory – if rather abrupt – resolution. No codas for Rees, it seems. Anyway, it’s on Project Gutenburg so why not give it a try?


See also:

Aurealis: There’s a lot of entertainment in this story of crime and detection from an earlier era, reminding us of the competence and cleverness of the successful detective novelists not named ‘Arthur Conan Doyle’ who were writing in the later part of the Sherlock Holmes era.

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
Gallery | This entry was posted in Classic mystery book review, Golden Age detection, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Arthur J. Rees: The Shrieking Pit

  1. I love that PG makes available so many of these novels that we might not otherwise have heard of, let alone tried. Thanks, Rich.

    Like

  2. kaggsysbookishramblings says:

    Sounds like great fun! Thanks for the heads-up about PG! 🙂

    Like

  3. John says:

    This is my favorite of the three Rees books I’ve read. I still have about five others that I packed away in a box ( I know where they are for once!) and I’m eager to dig into them. Thanks for this wonderfully detailed review that highlights Rees’ obvious love of eerie landscapes and outcast marginalized characters. Those are the elements in his books that made me keep returning to him.

    Thanks also for the link to the Scary Little Christmas blog (found in Rich’s Twitter feed over at the right for anyone else interested in visiting the site). This is the stuff I eat up, but not at all like Gryla. After learning of Krampus last year I was wondering what other mythological demons might be haunting the Christmas legends throughout the world. I never dreamed of a wealth of information so rich and nightmarish found in one place!

    Like

  4. realthog says:

    I’ve never heard of Rees but your fine review makes it obvious I should give him a try. And it’s on Project Gutenberg, yet? Irresistible.

    Like

  5. Thanks for the link to Gutenberg. I read these posts intently and enjoy them immensely. I have been searching for these older mysteries and am downloading what I find from Gutenberg. This one looks like a great book.

    Like

  6. Santosh Iyer says:

    I have downloaded the book from PG and I will submit further comments after reading it. ( John, I will not be able to perform a miracle this time since I have to read 2 other books before I pick this one. 🙂 )

    Like

  7. Never read him and I have to say the title might very well have put me off – thanks Rich

    Like

  8. sjhigbee says:

    I’ve never heard of Rees – but the book certainly sounds interesting. Thank you for reviewing this forgotten nugget…:)

    Like

  9. tracybham says:

    Could be interesting, with Zeppelins. The excerpt sounds very readable.

    Like

  10. Santosh Iyer says:

    I have finished the book. The author was unknown to me.
    This is quite a good and enjoyable mystery. Suspenseful till the end.
    The atmosphere is superb. A remote old inn on the coast of Norfolk. Mists rising across the marshes. Terrible winds. A weird legend that a ghost called The White Lady haunts the marshes often shrieking and that any one who sees her will die.
    The novel is completely clue based. There are many clues and the final resolution is the only one where all the clues fit.
    Mercifully (for me), the local dialect is kept to the minimum. I remember, once I attempted to read Lament For A Maker by Michael Innes, but gave it up since I couldn’t make head or tail of the Scottish dialect !
    I have, however, one complaint. The book is often verbose, slowing down the pace considerably.

    Like

    • westwoodrich says:

      Glad you enjoyed it Santosh, I was wondering what took you so long!

      I think dialect is usually best kept to a minimum. It rarely improves readability and I find it was often used simply to denote stupidity (or at least simplicity).

      Like

  11. Pingback: Arthur J. Rees: The Hand in the Dark | Past Offences Classic Crime Fiction

  12. Pingback: Smelly old books of the year, 2015 | Past Offences Classic Crime Fiction

Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s