Israel Zangwill: The Big Bow Mystery

Big_Bow_Mystery

‘”My God!” he cried.’ Mrs Drabdump and Inspector Grodman open the locked room.

The Big Bow Mystery
Israel Zangwill
First published in the UK, 1892 by Henry
Source: Project Gutenburg

The Big Bow Mystery is generally regarded as the first fully-fledged example of that staple of the mystery genre, the locked-room story. There are numerous antecedents (notably Poe’s The Murders in the Rue Morgue), but this short novel of 1892 brought together most of the typical elements for the first time.

Israel Zangwill’s other great contribution to literary history was his play The Melting Pot, which did much to capture the American immigrant experience and was a huge hit in its time. Zangwill’s nickname was the ‘Dickens of the ghetto’, and in fact the opening to The Big Bow Mystery is Dickensian:

There are mornings when King Fog masses his molecules of carbon in serried squadrons in the city, while he scatters them tenuously in the suburbs; so that your morning train may bear you from twilight to darkness.

Instead of Dickens’ famous Megalosaurus waddling up Holborn Hill, the fog clears to reveal only a perpetually disappointed widow clearing her grate. Who is a brilliant creation, by the way – if you read nothing else of this book, read the first chapter.

Mrs Drabdump, of 11 Glover Street, Bow, was one of the few persons in London whom fog did not depress. She went about her work quite as cheerlessly as usual.

The widow Drabdump is landlady to two social activists. Arthur Constant, B.A. – ‘white handed and white shirted’ is a middle-class do-gooder held in high regard by everyone in the slums of Bow. Tom Mortlake is a compositor-turned-union-leader. On this foggy morning Mrs Drabdump wakes up to find Mortlake gone and Constant suspiciously quiet behind his locked bedroom door.

She fetches local celebrity, Inspector Grodman, retired hero of Scotland Yard and best-selling author of Criminals I Have Caught, to break open the door and reveal the horribly slain body of Constant. No murderer could possibly have left the room, and yet Constant clearly did not kill himself. After a short period of official confusion, the Coroner’s summing-up describes the mystery perfectly.

The answer, then, to our first question, Did the deceased commit suicide? is, that he did not.
The answer then to our second inquiry – was the deceased killed by another person? – is, that he was not.

In true Victorian fashion, the ‘Big Bow Mystery’ becomes a matter for prurient public debate, with the suicide and murder camps arguing their cases in the letters pages of the newspapers. Additional commentary is provided for the reader by local wastrel Denzil Cantercot and his friend (and long-suffering landlord) Peter Crowl.

The story is driven by the competition between two famous detectives, ex-Inspector Grodman and current Inspector Wimp. The two men loathe each other behind a façade of friendly rivalry, and both represent different camps in the public debate.

Denzil knew of Edward Wimp, principally because of Grodman’s contempt for his successor. Wimp was a man of taste and culture, Grodman’s interests were entirely concentrated on the problems of logic and evidence […] Wimp with his flexible intellect, had a great contempt for Grodman and his slow, laborious, ponderous, almost Teutonic methods.

Obviously, the true story is revealed at the end, and the ending surprised me in terms of the simplicity of the solution, whodunit, and why.  The Big Bow Mystery is a light read and well worth the investment of a few hours, especially if you are a fan of Dickens’ funny bits.  I can do no better than quote Zangwill’s own review of the book in his introduction:

“The Big Bow Mystery” seems to me an excellent murder story, as murder stories go, for, while as sensational as the most of them, it contains more humor and character creation than the best.


See also:

Mary Reed at Mystery*FileAfter various red herrings are thrown back into the briny and trips into investigative cul de sacs are reversed, the culprit turns out to be the least likely suspect, who committed the crime for a particularly vile reason. The explanation of how a murder could be committed in a locked room is clever, hinging partly on the physical arrangements and partly on a psychological point, the clew to which is given in fair fashion early in the novel.

enotesThe Big Bow Mystery offers a graphic picture of late Victorian life in a seething London working-class neighborhood. Zangwill effectively combined social realism of the streets with a realistic depiction of the criminal investigative process.

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
Gallery | This entry was posted in Classic mystery book review, Locked room mystery, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Israel Zangwill: The Big Bow Mystery

  1. heavenali says:

    Oh this does sound good I will have to download myself a copy.

    Like

  2. Haven;t read this one in decades but I do remember the ending very well. Incidentally, served as the basis for the rather good Peter Lorre and SYdney Greenstreet vehicle, THE VERDICT, and was pretty faithful too: http://www.tcm.turner.com/tcmdb/title/2856/The-Verdict/videos.html

    Like

  3. realthog says:

    Oh this does sound like one that has to be added to the reader — many thanks!

    Gutenberg.

    Like

  4. tracybham says:

    I am glad you reviewed this. I wasn’t sure if it was worth my time or even the time to find a copy. But it does sound interesting and worthwhile.

    Like

  5. Bev Hankins says:

    I thoroughly enjoyed this when I read it back in 2011 in a Dover edition that includes two other early mysteries (The Unknown Weapon by Andrew Forrester & My Lady’s Money by Wilkie Collins). Thanks for reminding me of it.

    Like

  6. Santosh Iyer says:

    I have just finished reading the book.
    It is a clever murder mystery. It is doubtful that any reader will be able to guess the whodunit, howdunit or whydunit. All three will come as a surprise !
    However, I have a complaint. It is very wordy at times, with a lot of digressions and irrelevant and dull conversations between characters. I often felt like shouting,”Come to the point !”

    Like

  7. Santosh Iyer says:

    I have seen the film The Verdict (1946) and find that it is almost a faithful adaptation, though the names are all different except for Grodman.
    However, there is a significant variation that the murderer has a powerful and more plausible motive.

    Like

  8. Pingback: Gaston Leroux: Mystery of the Yellow Room | Past Offences Classic Crime Fiction

  9. Pingback: Smelly old books of the year, 2015 | Past Offences Classic Crime Fiction

  10. Pingback: Fergus Hume: The Mystery of a Hansom Cab | Past Offences: Classic crime, thrillers and mystery book reviews

Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s