John Dickson Carr: The Devil in Velvet


Cool cover, but is this supposed to be seventeenth-century clothing?

I had been long anticipating the moment when my reading of the CWA’s top 100 crime and mystery books eventually brought me to The Devil in Velvet. It’s going to take a lot to beat the oddity of this book’s set-up.

Professor Nicholas Fenton makes a deal with the Devil in order to be sent back in time to occupy the body of his namesake, Restoration rake Nick Fenton. The Professor has a theory about the murder of Fenton’s wife Lydia, and wants to see if he is right. So that’s time travel and the Devil covered in chapter one. On to the main event…

Fenton travels back in time expressly to solve a mystery which has evaded his historians’ research skills. Who exactly poisoned the other Fenton’s wife, and how? But as soon as he gets there, he finds there are complications. The old Fenton has more than one lady on the go, and the new Fenton has to pick his favourite in a hurry (by the way, I think Carr may have had a thing for seventeenth-century wenches – it’s slightly painful to read). New Fenton also finds old Fenton is embroiled in a political struggle between one bunch of courtiers and another bunch of courtiers (this is why I never made it as a historian – and the Restoration was definitely ‘my period’ as well).

Nicholas Fenton (the historian, not the cavalier) is an expert in the minutiae of daily life, and an acknowledged master of seventeenth-century speech patterns. It might not make him an interesting first date, but it does mean he manages to integrate into his new life in a matter of a few hours. Those closest to the real Fenton develop a mild suspicion that something is wrong, but that soon passes. Carr has also mastered his speech patterns and shares his mastery with us liberally. Here’s some of chapter five:

‘Crafty as a daggle-gown at Westminster Hall.’

‘Your mind, good fellow, is more nauseous than Snow Hill in August.’

‘Scratch me, but there’s a fine wench!’

Carr was clearly a details man, and in his notes at the end of the book he speaks fondly of his map of London covering an entire wall. His research really shines through in his dense descriptions of the sights and sounds of Restoration London. He is especially strong on food, drink, fencing and clothes. Fenton’s bumbling friend George wears a purple coat and white-cartoon waistcoat with gold buttons (George is careful to wipe his greasy hands on the back of his waistcoat after eating, so that the strains won’t show). An Alsatian bully wears a tattered coat tightly fastened with pewter buttons and rusty greenish breeches laced to rusty greenish stockings.

But honestly, with all the atmosphere, all the detail, all the politics, and all the Restorationese, I lost track of what the hell was going on quite early, and I never quite got back on track. Nor did I care particularly. I didn’t like either of the two Fentons, the mystery was almost an afterthought tacked on to a deep-dive into seventeenth-century life, and I wasn’t terrifically motivated to pay closer attention.

For me, I think the core problem in Devil is that it sounds like it should be a post-modern cross-genre romp, but it doesn’t quite make it. I’m sure Carr could have written a funnier book, and I wish he had gone for that instead of seriousness.

*waits for fan backlash*

John Dickson Carr
The Devil in Velvet
First published in the US by Harper, 1951
This edition, Carroll and Graf Publishers, Inc. 1994
John Dickson Carr
ISBN: 9780786701018
334 pages

See also:

Vintage Pop Fictions: The book is a combination of a clever murder mystery, a strange love story, a political thriller and an enjoyable adventure romp, with some fascinating insights into daily life in the 17th century to add extra interest and spice.  Considering that it was written in the early 1950s it’s also surprisingly frank in dealing with matters of sex. In some ways it has a very modern feel, somewhat akin to the wonderful genre-bending alternative history fantasy novels of writers like Tim Powers and Mary Gentle. In fact it’s a book I can recommend to fantasy and horror fans as well as crime fiction fans. An unusual but very entertaining novel.

Dust and Corruption: It’s a rip-roaring read, and with some genuine surprises. The final solution to the mystery was a real shock for me, but it made absolute sense. I loved the introduction of another time-traveler, something you rarely get in time-travel stories. The supernatural elements are well handled; Satan is given both charm and repellence, and there’s hints of the Other Power making Its presence known in the character’s lives as well.

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
This entry was posted in History-mystery, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to John Dickson Carr: The Devil in Velvet

  1. kaggsysbookishramblings says:

    Sounds utterly bizarre…..!


  2. J. J. McC. says:

    This is the only JDC novel I positively disliked, so I agree with your review. I think he was more successful integrating the history and mystery in his later historical mysteries, but even so they’re not my favorite Carrs.


  3. realthog says:

    My reaction to the book was rather similar to yours, although I didn’t find myself losing track of the plot. It’s certainly not Carr at his best, for me, and not the best even of his timeslip novels — try Fear is the Same (1957, as CD), if you get the chance.


  4. I remember liking it a lot at the time, and it was very popular in its day, but I suspect i need to re-read this, though I am so partial to Carr, that I may still like it a lot 🙂


  5. Guy Savage says:

    Sounds like a bit of a mixed bag.


  6. This one’s still on my shelf – I’ll get round to it sooner or later, but the time-travel aspect is a bit silly – just like Fire, Burn!


  7. JJ says:

    I felt much the same about The Bride of Newgate (though the first six or so chapters of that are frank genius). It’s a bit of an adventure romp, but not as fun or as funny as it should have been and the mystery is rather minor.

    But, then, I loved Fire, Burn! – of which most of the same can be said. TDiV is on my shelf, will try to get to it before too long, now….


  8. John says:

    Reading a review like this just intensifies my reluctance to read the rest of Carr’s time-slip and historical mysteries. A few years ago I started THE WITCH OF THE LOW TIDE and got bored with it and stopped reading. Same thing happened with CAPTAIN CUT-THROAT when I started it last year. His exuberance for the period detail leads him astray at the expense of his real strength in concocting engaging yet convoluted plots. I think I’d quickly grow tired of all the 17th century lingo in this one and shut the darn book just as I did with the other two.


  9. JohnH says:

    This late afternoon I was rooting around the Carr bibliography for a title I had read in the summer of 1958+/-. I didn’t remember the title, but, limiting my search before 1960, the title of The Devil in Velvet struck a responsive chord. A search led me to this site and review. How strangely fortuitous to find that just this month you had posted it. So I will hie myself to the county library to get a copy, or, failing that, order on line.
    I also read your review of The 39 Steps (which I read a couple of years ago). The biggest difference from the Hitchcock version, amongst many differences, was the lack of a female character, let alone a romance.
    I’ve bookmarked the blog, and plan to visit often to catch-up.


Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s