Lois Austen-Leigh: The Incredible Crime

Men with brains and ability can be found all over the world, moreover there are always others coming on to fill their places, but such Jacobean rooms as this are not to be found all over the world, nor are they to be reproduced. The ceiling was finely moulded, and the walls panelled with oak, stained and darkened by the passing years. The dominant colour of the room was dark red or red-brown, the carpet was one or the other, the drawn curtains dark red, and two generous fires at each end of the room lit up the ruby tints of the decanters of port on the table and the splash of scarlet of a doctor’s hood someone had thrown down on the chair.

Although described as a Cambridge mystery, around half of The Incredible Crime is set in nearby rural Suffolk. However, there is still plenty of Cambridge flavour in Austen-Leigh’s depiction of crusty old dons bickering in their common room.

The story centres on Prudence, daughter of the Master of Prince’s College, and her two cousins. One is a bad-tempered and somewhat grimy Professor. The other is the fox-hunting lord of the manor over at Wellende Hall. One of them, it transpires, is a drug smuggler. Yes, this is yet another Golden Age smuggling story with an unlikely and probably fantastically unreliable distribution method.

Prudence is beautiful but considered all-but-unmarriageable by her friends because she is self-reliant and swears like a trooper. Yet she has a strong sense of right and wrong, and
determines to get to the bottom of this smuggling thing.

Unless, of course, it means upsetting any apple-carts. For this is genuinely the most self-consciously High Tory book I have ever read in a genre which wasn’t backwards in keeping the gentry at the top of the established order. Honestly it makes Gaudy Night look like the world turned upside-down. Fox-hunting, port, deference, obedience, ugh… There are several scenes where the loyalty of the peasantry (for example worrying about the master’s clothes being laid out properly even on their deathbeds) is discussed as though servants were naturally that way, and one scene where our supposed heroine lets a puppy sleep in her room, and then tries to make a servant feel bad about it as a matter of course. There is some irony, but not enough to make me feel as though I like this author.

A significant proportion of the book is spent in discussing fox-hunting, in language technical enough to be confusing to the layman. The world according to Prudence and her friends is split into those who do and those who don’t hunt.

Once mounted, her attention was fully taken up by her mare, who was fresh and fidgety. For the first hour hounds hunted round and round a large covert, the fox declining to break. Then in the far distance came that soul-stirring screech of ‘Gone away!’ There was a little pause, then one hound whimpered, two spoke to it, and then, encouraged by the huntsman, there was a sudden crash of music, and the whole pack went away at a racing speed on the line.

And is the crime incredible? Pretty much, actually. If by incredible you mean unbelievable. I defy anyone to guess what’s really going on at Wellende Hall.

Not really a crime, but incredible in its own right is the rather gruesome flirtation played out between Prudence and Professor Temple. The elderly don cuts his hair, shaves, and
has his teeth fixed in an attempt to woo his cousin. He even gets a puppy. And she goes for it, much to the delight of her friends:

When on one occasion he went out of his way to inform Prudence that she ought to be grateful to so great an intellect as Temple’s for sparing her a single thought, her meek acceptance of the statement quite frightened him.

Seems like subjugation is for woman as well as servants.

Not one for me…


Lois Austen-Leigh
The Incredible Crime
First published by Herbert Jenkins in the UK, 1931
This edition British Library, 2017
ISBN: 9780712356022
240 pages
Source: Review copy (sorry BL)

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
Gallery | This entry was posted in British Library Crime Classics, Golden Age detection, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Lois Austen-Leigh: The Incredible Crime

  1. MarinaSofia says:

    Oh, dear, yes, perhaps some of the Golden Age specimens deserve to be relegated to the past…

    Like

    • Igor Longo says:

      I will relegate to the past almost everything is published nowadays ,withgreat Political correctness,and no skill in plotting whatsoever.Never judge a book by its political opinions,it’s a very nazi way to book reviewing(or publishing).I’m very happy instead that BL has found another precious little gem from a gloriious past.

      Like

  2. Oh dear! And I was looking forward to trying this one as well =(

    Like

  3. Doesn’t sound like one for me either – I can’t bear fox hunting…

    Like

  4. Igor Longo says:

    fox hunting is a good part of many excellent books in the whodunnit field.If you judge older books only for their adherence to pC and the values of nowadays,well the modern tripe is good for you.i don’t hunt even cockroaches and ants,but it’s a good,for god’s sake,it’s not your life.Judge it for its plot,not for politics!!!!!

    Like

  5. Igor Longo says:

    among the excellent fox huntig books you will never read THE LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER by McDonald, the splendid fox hunting book by Mignon Eberhart and the marvellous Dogs Do Bark by Quentin-Stagge.Read everything is good ,not everything is PC.

    Like

  6. Hmm, this sounds dire but a must-read, how awkward!

    Like

  7. jasonhalf says:

    An interesting overview of and response to a title that wasn’t on my radar. To me, the turn-off of a book like The Incredible Crime as you describe it isn’t an antiquated class perspective so much as an invitation into a world that seems hopelessly uninspired and stuffy. Would the reader want to sit in as “crusty dons” debate academics or witness a fox hunt (un-P.C. or no, to bang Igor Longo’s favorite drum) with every moment described through period-specific terminology? I suspect that, like you, this one wouldn’t be for me either, not because of the mindset but because of the low return on reader investment.

    But it raises an interesting point of just how fragile the concoction for a successful GAD soufflé truly is, and it calls attention to the relative skills and merits of each chef. Thanks for the review, Rich —

    Like

Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s