Philip Van Doren Stern: The Case of the Corpse in the Blind Alley

Virginia_Quarterly_ReviewCasting around for something to read for this month’s Crimes of the Century, which is looking at 1941, I came across Philip Van Doren Stern’s article ‘The Case of the Corpse in the Blind Alley’ in VQR Online, the digitised archive of literary journal The Virginia Quarterly Review.

Philip Van Doren Stern (1900-84) was an American author, journalist, and Civil War historian. For a seasonal bonus point, Van Doren Stern wrote the story ‘The Greatest Gift’ which inspired It’s a Wonderful Life.

Anyway, PVDS, as I’ll be calling him, certainly knew how to stir up the old hornet’s nest. Check out some of these beauties…

Whatever artistic possibilities the detective story had were realized at its birth.

There is a simple test which can be used to judge a mystery story. Put yourself in the place of the murderer. Then ask whether you would go about killing a man in the way indicated in the story under consideration. Would you put bacteria-infected cheese mites in the Stilton the butler is about to serve to the gentleman you want to slay? Would you transmit your instructions tattooed in ideographs on the posterior of a Chinese orphan? Of course you would not, and thus you immediately know the story is trash.

To the modern reader who is honest with himself and not overawed by reputation, the Sherlock Holmes detective stories, great as they are, are beginning to take on a slightly antiquated flavor. Poe’s tales of ratiocination are period pieces in many respects, but their artistry saves them from seeming dated.

(By the way PVDS knew his Poe. As a historian and editor he put together the edition of Poe which became the standard anthology for decades.)

There is no reason why a tale concerning itself with the most soul-racking deed a human being can undertake should be a silly, mechanically contrived affair. The writer of murder mysteries holds high cards in his hand; if he does not know how to play them, that does not lessen their value.

Interestingly, Wikipedia says that PVDS published a mystery, The Case of The Thing in the Brook, under the pseudonym Peter Storme in 1941. Mystery*File says: ‘not a book anyone should seek out actively — it is not particularly well written and the characters are cardboard’. #justsaying

Anyway, PVDS eventually gets around to bloggers. Sort of. Even though he hadn’t even heard of blogs. If you’re a blogger, look away now…

Investigation of the whole situation surrounding the writing, publishing, selling, and reviewing of mysteries reveals one little-noticed fact: the mystery story is at a standstill because it is being written for a purely professional audience.

Around each one of the many rental libraries scattered across the country is a small but determined group of readers—most of them men—who devour almost every mystery story published. They take their daily dose of murder with the frenzied enthusiasm of a drug addict. They know all the tricks; they have followed all the detectives, erudite, dumb, exotically Oriental, depressingly homespun; they are familiar with all the ways a human being can be put to death […]

There is no use wasting time deploring the miserable lot of these devotees who spend their lives so vicariously and so futilely. The root of their devotion can probably be traced to an unhappy childhood, business worries, or a maladjusted sex life, rather than to a genuine interest in any kind of literature.

Oof.

You can read the full piece at VQR Online. Meanwhile, why not take my quick quiz? 😉

 

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
Gallery | This entry was posted in Classic crime round-up, Classic mystery book review, Crime fiction of the year challenge, Crimes of the Century, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Philip Van Doren Stern: The Case of the Corpse in the Blind Alley

  1. bkfriedman says:

    I passed (failed?) your quiz and will never read or write about another thing in the mystery genre. I have no desire to appear to others as a geek, and so I take this vow, on my honor as a Jedi knight!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. cmikolj says:

    I’m just a humble reader but I do like a book where something actually happens – and the more outlandish the method of murder, the more fun the book is. If that makes me a sad person, then Bonjour Tristesse I say!

    Like

  3. tracybham says:

    Very interesting post, Rich. And funny.

    Like

  4. I would find that completely hilarious if it weren’t for the shock of realizing that ALL those reasons underlie my tragic interest in the genre…

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: ‘The shadow of war’: #1941book results | Past Offences Classic Crime Fiction

Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s