Arthur Conan Doyle: The Hound of the Baskervilles

A_Staunge_and_terrible_Wunder

The 1577 appearance of Black Shuck in Bungay was apparently one of the inspirations for the Hound (or so it’s always claimed in Bungay).

The Hound of the Baskervilles
Arthur Conan Doyle
First published in the UK 1901-02 in the Strand magazine
176 pages in print
This edition Project Gutenberg

I’m getting to the point, two thirds of the way through my personal challenge to read the CWA top 100 crime books, that the remaining titles are either so obscure I haven’t seen them in four years of bookshop browsing, or so famous that probably most of you have read them already.

For example, I’m sure there’s very little new that can be said about The Hound of the Baskervilles (or indeed any Sherlock Holmes story). For what it’s worth, it’s my favourite of the four Holmes novels. A Study in Scarlet and The Sign of Four come encumbered with lengthy back stories and are overloaded with Sherlock quirks (not that anybody dislikes Sherlock quirks); The Hound is content to live in the moment, and puts the story first.

Here are four reasons I enjoyed re-reading it this week, and at the bottom, a link to a very interesting article about its authorship:

1. Conan Doyle had a lovely command of eccentrics. Dr James Mortimer bursts into chapter 1 a gabbling mass of bizarre phrenological obsessions. How many people would ask for someone’s skull within five minutes of making their acquaintance?

‘You interest me very much, Mr. Holmes. I had hardly expected so dolichocephalic a skull or such well-marked supra-orbital development. Would you have any objection to my running my finger along your parietal fissure? A cast of your skull, sir, until the original is available, would be an ornament to any anthropological museum. It is not my intention to be fulsome, but I confess that I covet your skull.’

Equally barking is Mr Frankland, engaging in multiple futile law cases.

‘I have brought off a double event. I mean to teach them in these parts that law is law, and that there is a man here who does not fear to invoke it. I have established a right of way through the centre of old Middleton’s park, slap across it, sir, within a hundred yards of his own front door. What do you think of that? We’ll teach these magnates that they cannot ride roughshod over the rights of the commoners, confound them! And I’ve closed the wood where the Fernworthy folk used to picnic. These infernal people seem to think that there are no rights of property, and that they can swarm where they like with their papers and their bottles. Both cases decided, Dr. Watson, and both in my favour. I haven’t had such a day since I had Sir John Morland for trespass because he shot in his own warren.’

Wonderfully vivid – you can almost tug on their mutton-chops.

2. It’s a shame Victorians were so Victorian. Couldn’t Sir Henry and Miss Stapleton have got together somehow? What happened to love conquering all? I expect she ended up picking oakum and/or smallpox scabs in the Baskerville Asylum for Betrayed Gentlewomen.

3. Watson is at the forefront of The Hound, and it’s good to see how someone less equipped than Holmes handles a case. And how wonderfully frank is this line, written after Holmes’ famous reappearance?

A crushing weight of responsibility seemed in an instant to be lifted from my soul. That cold, incisive, ironical voice could belong to but one man in all the world.
‘Holmes!’ I cried—’Holmes!’

4. Conan Doyle was a fair descriptive writer, although nobody could really believe this is a diary entry (as is claimed in the text):

October 16th. A dull and foggy day with a drizzle of rain. The house is banked in with rolling clouds, which rise now and then to show the dreary curves of the moor, with thin, silver veins upon the sides of the hills, and the distant boulders gleaming where the light strikes upon their wet faces.

And here’s the interesting article…

The scandal haunting The Hound of the BaskervillesDoyle wrote to his mother that “Fletcher Robinson came here with me and we are going to do a small book together ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’—a real creeper.” In the same letter, he mentioned that the book was already half written. Doyle also wrote to his editor offering him the story but stipulating, “I must do it with my friend Robinson and his name must appear with mine.”

Final destination: A keeper


Creative Commons License
Past Offences by Rich Westwood is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

About pastoffences

Past Offences exists to review classic crime and mystery books, with ‘classic’ meaning books originally published before 1987.
Gallery | This entry was posted in Classic mystery book review, Sherlock Holmes, Witness Statements and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Arthur Conan Doyle: The Hound of the Baskervilles

  1. kaggsysbookishramblings says:

    Agreed – it’s actually hard to post about a well-loved classics; I often find myself asking myself if I can really say anything new. Nevertheless you’ve produced an interesting post here and that link is particularly intriguing…. 🙂

    Like

  2. I actually prefer SIGN OF THE FOUR (or even SIGN OF FOUR while we are being pernickety) but this is, as you say, impossible to ignore.

    Like

  3. Santosh Iyer says:

    This is also my favourite among the 4 novels.
    There have been several film adaptations not only in UK and USA but also in several other countries like India, Russia and Germany.
    There are 2 Indian film adaptations, Jighansa (1951) in Bengali and Bees Saal Baad (1962) in Hindi. Both were super hits.

    Like

  4. This is definitely one of the top Holmes stories, I think, RIch. And I agree; it’s good to see Watson in the lead role, so to speak. Thanks for your thoughts on this.

    Like

  5. lesblatt says:

    I agree completely, Rich – it’s the strongest by far of the four novels, IMHO. It’s also a great book to use as a way of introducing teenagers to the joys of older mystery fiction. I still get a thrill each time I read, “Mr. Holmes, they were the footprints of a gigantic hound!”

    Like

  6. Definitely my favorite!

    Like

  7. richmonde says:

    Watson was a writer – Holmes admired his skill. Why shouldn’t his diary be literary? And I never realised Frankland’s obsessions were utterly contradictory! Where are we going to picnic now?

    Like

  8. Santosh Iyer says:

    I have gone through the article referred by you at the end.
    The charges made by Roger Garrick-Steele were elaborated by him in his poorly written book of over 600 pages titled The House Of The Baskervilles (2003). This book is available at http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-House-Baskervilles-Rodger-Garrick-Steele/dp/1410772101

    Like

  9. Bev Hankins says:

    Hound is also my favorite of the Holmes novels. It has so much to love–from the moor scenes to Watson’s part in the story to the air of the supernatural (even though we all know it will be explained by Holmes). Great stuff!

    Like

  10. Pingback: Review: The Hound of the Baskervilles by Arthur Conan Doyle | A Crime is Afoot

Make a statement...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s